{"id":"W3004672846","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.307","title":"Maximizing confidence in a negative result: Quantitative sample adequacy control","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","topic":"Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont; McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Confidence interval; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Control sample; Positive control; Negative control; Sample size determination; Medicine; Internal medicine; Statistics; Biology; Pathology; Mathematics; Chromatography; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0317803,0.001455721,0.001419771,0.002745261,0.001506716,0.002750879,0.002772394,0.00215212,0.003326744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07031517,0.001180875,0.0008670902,0.001720753,0.004122803,0.001786477,0.003223247,0.002617885,0.001605604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001357267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002058255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001419008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9455842,0.01952991,0.003757484,0.008676554,0.02073716,0.001714656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298115,0.03785446,0.006621719,0.009540023,0.01522015,0.0009521599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001273468,0.0004826345,0.02383703,0.001588378,0.0001858209,0.0005092571,0.002347625,0.005021533,0.7981305,0.01644409,0.004480281,0.1456994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008364875,0.001137115,0.01382447,0.0003264106,0.0001768547,0.001150335,0.0003021226,0.04034529,0.9014259,0.0115635,0.0293196,0.0003448072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05248331,0.001873504,0.9352918,0.0004622047,0.0004554882,0.001597343,0.0005451578,0.002532215,0.004758867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3491395,0.0009092995,0.6405931,0.0006761653,0.0001806311,0.0032262,0.001072876,0.0006877362,0.003514431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1680722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05534041619888769,"score_gpt":0.3447634175449664,"score_spread":0.2894230013460787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}