{"id":"W3004672846","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.307","title":"Maximizing confidence in a negative result: Quantitative sample adequacy control","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","topic":"Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont; McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Confidence interval; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Control sample; Positive control; Negative control; Sample size determination; Medicine; Internal medicine; Statistics; Biology; Pathology; Mathematics; Chromatography; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552786,0.00006854963,0.0001599886,0.0000629363,0.000061267,0.00002179893,0.00005067047,0.00007021261,0.000008677802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009297292,0.00005972425,0.00004671315,0.0001439527,0.00005263654,0.000009817176,0.00001918455,0.0001719037,6.132707e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001837862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002396915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002399856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009401522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.0001925461,0.0003368195,0.0001249053,0.00006011696,0.0001377805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999264,0.00005412104,0.0003021584,0.00006012934,0.0001452596,0.0001743507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002180878,0.001205158,0.3024875,0.00043339,0.0006665448,0.00003727272,0.007969337,0.0005169027,0.370208,0.1361544,0.02639914,0.1517415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01200736,0.01708882,0.1912102,0.0002440134,0.00003934275,0.0005438683,0.002577807,0.003949102,0.01903588,0.007227444,0.7451251,0.0009510796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3779629,0.0006151024,0.5855074,0.03541241,0.00004481117,0.0002503886,0.00002326445,0.000009242441,0.0001745185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877639,0.001204984,0.00507774,0.00585621,0.00007316472,0.000007519846,0.000008556499,0.000005282051,0.000002677068],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.718726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2435484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05534041619888769,"score_gpt":0.3447634175449664,"score_spread":0.2894230013460787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}