{"id":"W3004687355","doi":"10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.025","title":"Edibles and Canadian consumers’ willingness to consider recreational cannabis in food or beverage products: A second assessment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Food Science & Technology","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cannabis; Legalization; Recreation; Stigma (botany); Public opinion; Business; Food safety; Purchasing; Perception; Environmental health; Marketing; Advertising; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005250995,0.0001785667,0.0003604981,0.002755008,0.000153761,0.00005323438,0.0003094285,0.000159116,0.0004332585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007443097,0.000154349,0.00002035114,0.007271453,0.001106451,0.0001383478,0.0001747771,0.0005016783,0.000003700891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004020669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003966731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2811452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976688,0.00002865691,0.0003242523,0.0007880869,0.0004257078,0.0007644906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988651,0.00001092806,0.00004559322,0.0003147839,0.0002340943,0.0005294607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007330732,0.0006253305,0.5848259,0.000499292,0.0001370693,0.001281089,0.009038237,0.00009295769,0.05438398,0.02184107,0.07856891,0.247973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006003021,0.01050668,0.5924621,0.0003388171,0.00002743097,0.0006835015,0.006873697,0.0007707786,0.03760433,0.001223751,0.3424951,0.001010758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7840981,0.0002931997,0.000007046143,0.2133231,0.00007604811,0.0003984058,0.00005570685,0.00004561126,0.001702802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961184,0.00002006934,0.0008702647,0.001543326,0.00003005139,0.0001786955,0.000008776249,0.00001478743,0.001215673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2771785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.731972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05170937940559109,"score_gpt":0.348530601701465,"score_spread":0.2968212222958739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}