{"id":"W3005498630","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2020.00001","title":"Cumulative Effects and Boreal Woodland Caribou: How Bow-Tie Risk Analysis Addresses a Critical Issue in Canada's Forested Landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; University of Victoria; Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Cumulative effects; Geography; Ecology; Risk assessment; Population; Environmental science; Predation; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001453031,0.0001055091,0.0002538259,0.00008087818,0.0001186222,0.000009825948,0.00005655492,0.0001423996,0.00002613132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004354197,0.0001054326,0.00001803439,0.000373466,0.0001648946,0.0001686807,0.00005871282,0.0001889114,0.000001410996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002843592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006138728,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2199265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9399834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990112,0.0002372997,0.0001366268,0.0002942864,0.00007642859,0.00024422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995563,0.0002337362,0.00005365973,0.00005784847,0.00000674039,0.00009171404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009744799,0.00001965395,0.9916192,0.00001500852,0.00005340237,0.00002179485,0.0003669542,0.001176809,0.000001725993,0.00002307757,0.00608175,0.0005231344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005605722,0.00009230297,0.925751,0.000004328338,0.000125427,0.000001409722,0.0004290068,0.07204892,0.000002966873,0.0007189525,0.0001637024,0.0001014428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948866,0.0003015738,0.0009557276,0.003383987,0.0001771471,0.000168142,0.00002201198,0.000008679297,0.00009616302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989886,0.00008255076,0.0004325151,0.0003948307,0.00002415818,0.0000287379,0.00003243723,0.000003673463,0.00001254652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7200568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7852681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004173993484283872,"score_gpt":0.1952361727687563,"score_spread":0.1910621792844724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}