{"id":"W3005893985","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/pzbhw","title":"Evaluating the Evidential Value of Empirically Supported Psychological Treatments (ESTs): A Meta-Scientific Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Psychology; Statistical power; Bayes' theorem; Clinical study design; Value (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Clinical psychology; Statistics; Clinical trial; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Bayesian probability; Mathematics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04602883,0.002205949,0.01126986,0.0116064,0.0007667826,0.005072227,0.003268317,0.002531128,0.003661213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1396252,0.00129843,0.01503017,0.008657648,0.001313223,0.003467834,0.002243558,0.002418366,0.0004007033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004380277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008207423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003846189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009952085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9774499,0.0120457,0.006182974,0.001211232,0.002846857,0.0002633239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8483694,0.1314676,0.01079654,0.002803667,0.005905793,0.0006570373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000788359,0.00005172583,0.001521051,0.7702235,0.1137338,0.00006729691,0.0001927481,0.0003803583,0.0001795027,0.0009595248,0.001358941,0.1105431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005514466,0.0005106907,0.005254321,0.4822997,0.4885521,0.000261168,0.0002679307,0.0003572437,0.0004811183,0.002229629,0.01917338,0.00006130053],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005437458,0.998362,0.0003312317,0.0002105732,0.00009523601,0.0001508863,0.00009098271,0.000008494495,0.0002067896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02087912,0.9757809,0.001972307,0.0004592991,0.0001643766,0.0004395915,0.0002099429,0.00001179114,0.0000826297],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2434267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8450054927855346,"score_gpt":0.7129863199130718,"score_spread":0.1320191728724628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}