{"id":"W3006559941","doi":"10.3389/fenrg.2019.00137","title":"Assessment of a Theoretical Model for Predicting Forced Convective Critical Heat Flux in Rod Bundles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Energy Research","topic":"Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle; Mechanics; Turbulence; Critical heat flux; Materials science; Heat transfer; Bubble; Convective heat transfer; Flow (mathematics); Convection; Heat flux; Thermodynamics; Forced convection; Pressurized water reactor; Physics; Nuclear physics; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003981715,0.0005209143,0.000523612,0.0006550474,0.0004382475,0.0004530319,0.000920521,0.0008411835,0.0007900323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001068777,0.0002322938,0.0006147382,0.0003941388,0.0004006766,0.0006307674,0.000315473,0.0004444221,0.0002075563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008021031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008426805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007637951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002813655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998523,0.00003450664,0.000006667514,0.0000230183,0.0000585938,0.00002483489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996198,0.0001984306,0.00002702609,0.00002836759,0.0001069588,0.00001923655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003979035,0.00003757629,0.001561231,0.00005830752,0.000008005705,0.00009739803,0.00004939574,0.9736981,0.01308924,0.005068426,0.0002341297,0.00605841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001758577,0.00001655516,0.0001565961,0.00000211822,0.000001496373,0.000005232152,0.000004561671,0.9986082,0.0009035219,0.0002075059,0.0000899274,0.000002687967],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4137066,0.0005688998,0.5765699,0.0002124927,0.00006506288,0.0001686692,0.0002493069,0.0009127858,0.007546274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760178,0.0002782119,0.02210569,0.000016004,0.00001482682,0.000142419,0.0001256471,0.00007609936,0.001223312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007637951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01518697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02610155472354782,"score_gpt":0.3417880908321298,"score_spread":0.315686536108582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}