{"id":"W3006883411","doi":"10.19108/koers.85.1.2468","title":"Francis Schaeffer’s Relevance to Contemporary Apologetics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Bible Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Materialism; Apologetics; Christianity; Context (archaeology); Psyche; Aesthetics; Mysticism; Relevance (law); Religious experience; Skepticism; Kitsch; Religious studies; History; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology; Law; Archaeology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002747339,0.0003020551,0.0002881434,0.001371486,0.005254934,0.007949485,0.0009881355,0.005392914,0.006386151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01404056,0.000162727,0.0001357865,0.00103014,0.02423676,0.008310778,0.002044265,0.005982491,0.001055332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003857085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002598071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004162183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004554412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972971,0.001631786,0.0000852047,0.0002853724,0.0005162377,0.0001842826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925749,0.005744736,0.0003445036,0.0003564029,0.0006316555,0.0003477157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001405698,0.00001269807,0.0001192431,0.0001132872,0.000003053261,0.0001779442,0.01308505,0.00007411166,0.0000698523,0.8352147,0.1355173,0.01559877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000458058,0.000007052717,0.0002030412,0.0003616619,0.000002158538,0.0003237739,0.003963926,0.0001173429,0.000112871,0.1456148,0.8492745,0.00001427031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009161308,0.1140901,0.003257817,0.5789985,0.01292825,0.00001526128,0.00004889792,0.00007041381,0.2814294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7078446,0.05064448,0.002243282,0.08973338,0.03189346,0.00007820164,0.00003922225,0.0001447368,0.1173786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007949485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02798527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.110959814353022,"score_gpt":0.2776451604873568,"score_spread":0.1666853461343348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}