{"id":"W3007103682","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00158","title":"The diabolical sovereigns/banks risk loop: A VAR quantile design","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Asymmetries","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; CVAR; Downside risk; Spillover effect; Economics; Credit risk; Econometrics; Copula (linguistics); Vector autoregression; Predictability; Tail risk; Granger causality; Shock (circulatory); Financial economics; Expected shortfall; Monetary economics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550562,0.0004372083,0.0009966774,0.0005013709,0.0003601876,0.001690297,0.00137883,0.001356148,0.006729934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093802,0.0005537194,0.0005175878,0.0005940344,0.0008369153,0.001454399,0.001562878,0.001473529,0.0004158928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004880785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007697234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001081789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001080652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998576,0.0008590224,0.0000385806,0.0002713758,0.0001228523,0.0001321704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968848,0.002011688,0.0002138171,0.0004256342,0.0003262664,0.00013789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001780163,0.0004543983,0.00967388,0.0001436159,0.0002532887,0.0002001836,0.0002536387,0.506085,0.005154824,0.3118824,0.003589172,0.1605294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005665229,0.0001025217,0.0007667146,0.000009747143,0.00003454937,0.0000177351,0.00001471326,0.9737079,0.0004624121,0.02414214,0.0006701049,0.00001487049],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08003183,0.0002090794,0.9149298,0.0005536695,0.00005975312,0.00007967938,0.0001788827,0.0003084426,0.003648825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186194,0.0001550783,0.07511824,0.0001936786,0.0001089044,0.0001191394,0.0002025316,0.0001006209,0.005382401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006729934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02935451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03971988406162907,"score_gpt":0.2284806993979548,"score_spread":0.1887608153363257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}