{"id":"W3007103682","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00158","title":"The diabolical sovereigns/banks risk loop: A VAR quantile design","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Economic Asymmetries","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quantile; CVAR; Downside risk; Spillover effect; Economics; Credit risk; Econometrics; Copula (linguistics); Vector autoregression; Predictability; Tail risk; Granger causality; Shock (circulatory); Financial economics; Expected shortfall; Monetary economics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005729944,0.0002000451,0.000587008,0.0001046275,0.0004166123,0.0002040923,0.0009114516,0.00009751559,0.0003097382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001721367,0.0001343217,0.0002888477,0.0002081862,0.0002333879,0.0002895838,0.0001386438,0.0005583081,0.0002061788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001524719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001188309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001096878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000211619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978965,0.0001855701,0.001301983,0.0002043036,0.00007018732,0.0003414831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958683,0.001844159,0.001650426,0.0003888563,0.00007193878,0.000176291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002903974,0.0001838898,0.2369894,0.00004865102,0.001562512,0.00001184162,0.002743383,0.005133281,0.00001464658,0.6664786,0.0614983,0.0224315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002243369,0.0009966191,0.04438147,0.00002100138,0.0001495677,0.00005131972,0.0008448598,0.3847549,0.0002037503,0.3666684,0.1989763,0.0007084685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7934697,0.02017541,0.1321276,0.01507127,0.002260223,0.0007511385,0.000407261,0.00004948398,0.03568785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945846,0.003793975,0.0004974826,0.0004606196,0.0004584166,0.000002631122,8.434402e-7,0.00002722706,0.0001742489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5477478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03971988406162907,"score_gpt":0.2284806993979548,"score_spread":0.1887608153363257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}