{"id":"W3007452449","doi":"10.1002/smr.2255","title":"Bad smell detection using quality metrics and refactoring opportunities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Software Evolution and Process","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Code smell; Code refactoring; Computer science; Maintainability; False positive paradox; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Software quality; Set (abstract data type); Technical debt; Software maintenance; Software; Code (set theory); Source code; Software engineering; Software system; Artificial intelligence; Software development; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006616286,0.00009652536,0.0001807649,0.0002301215,0.0001220404,0.0001411674,0.0002114585,0.00006190169,0.000002233395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002301123,0.00008856371,0.00003338722,0.0005227554,0.00003739531,0.0009182117,0.00009406744,0.0002765208,4.160302e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008465529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001422388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001267348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.074222e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998899,0.00005903811,0.0003074058,0.0001536308,0.0004249148,0.0001559823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986925,0.0003609915,0.0002083801,0.00008210255,0.0004140169,0.0002420408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002179949,0.0001248399,0.6831611,0.002552873,0.0002076183,0.0001616202,0.01036906,0.00480802,0.006309086,0.001700684,0.0001254427,0.2902616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002818428,0.001541852,0.8378704,0.0005581337,0.0000960355,0.001409542,0.002258602,0.1334341,0.009515989,0.005495366,0.003741973,0.00125954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.417601,0.001308947,0.5807084,0.0001387641,0.0001599216,0.00002768923,8.633219e-7,0.00005178974,0.000002670114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842429,0.0001468611,0.01537694,0.00005530299,0.0001634436,5.957401e-7,1.293768e-7,0.000007571155,0.000006217844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.566642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3611523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1255498175057313,"score_gpt":0.3338147225408901,"score_spread":0.2082649050351588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}