{"id":"W3007858984","doi":"10.1002/eap.2095","title":"Evaluating forest resilience to global threats using functional response traits and network properties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Ecology; Psychological resilience; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007368849,0.000394942,0.0001889266,0.001307509,0.0002794584,0.0004811021,0.0002377432,0.0002551621,0.0007655308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001699814,0.00008243237,0.0004037443,0.000740356,0.0003669952,0.0005514754,0.0003888558,0.000184304,0.00006419895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007633003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003164822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02809774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04710429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998159,0.00004953951,0.00001254924,0.00004780489,0.00003625861,0.00003799533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990722,0.0003409416,0.0002933296,0.00008338711,0.00009491672,0.0001152386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002723155,0.0001487731,0.892139,0.00006233647,0.0003241963,0.00007749395,0.0001786865,0.0694398,0.01867572,0.000516171,0.0001015153,0.01806396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000603052,0.0001665934,0.9177964,0.0000067457,0.00006019365,0.00004980453,0.0001926351,0.07890279,0.002110996,0.0005532813,0.0001396526,0.00001482114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981683,0.00002159522,0.00135509,0.000007087133,5.031018e-7,0.000006000443,0.0001619906,0.00001045171,0.0002689195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988802,0.0000117286,0.0009062776,0.000002405553,4.541309e-7,0.000004482175,0.0001422172,0.000001613412,0.00005057059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02809774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05586839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08970306710083277,"score_gpt":0.3195646620024406,"score_spread":0.2298615949016078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}