{"id":"W3008044694","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwz047.140","title":"A141 ENDOSCOPIST PROCEDURAL VOLUME AND COLONOSCOPY OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","topic":"Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Colonoscopy; Medicine; Odds ratio; Meta-analysis; Subgroup analysis; Confidence interval; Colorectal cancer; Adverse effect; Internal medicine; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01055121,0.002636387,0.01718226,0.006510475,0.0007183974,0.003538145,0.00195634,0.002438908,0.004813609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03069138,0.001708079,0.04380146,0.007960232,0.000717686,0.001868428,0.001425407,0.002357943,0.0004251743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002841885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004217414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009133566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01762442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902425,0.00433112,0.002907068,0.001072746,0.001058827,0.0003875702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799008,0.01434692,0.003494803,0.0004834033,0.001531881,0.0002422071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001542867,0.00003089225,0.004666754,0.4036527,0.5795062,0.0001212922,0.00005493742,0.0005454011,0.0001475134,0.0001314892,0.0008109595,0.008789033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005125052,0.0001489583,0.004184102,0.02593162,0.9672271,0.00008971051,0.00002705022,0.000216381,0.00008001825,0.0001950735,0.001365493,0.00002197174],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004211361,0.9937862,0.0004038044,0.000185601,0.0001135055,0.0002389108,0.000774428,0.00002302846,0.0002631404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.167439,0.826014,0.002148836,0.001058353,0.0003581299,0.001281146,0.00123208,0.00003328275,0.0004352196],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01718226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0558008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03242143057024124,"score_gpt":0.3054947022358087,"score_spread":0.2730732716655674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}