{"id":"W3008054396","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.5997","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argumentation theory; Ambiguity; Normative; Computer science; Linguistics; Sentence; Natural language; Natural (archaeology); Natural language processing; Graph; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003090921,0.00006229377,0.0001314245,0.0000179454,0.000103249,0.00001706331,0.00008397399,0.00002177406,0.0001197711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001538072,0.00004467999,0.00005242355,0.000009121165,0.0001833764,0.00004718049,0.00004427858,0.00003460748,0.00002619061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001629446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001231755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001805115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003010107,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996142,0.000002497506,0.000168804,0.00005585149,0.0000423551,0.0001163278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997076,0.00004735375,0.00006996169,0.00004452215,0.0001077562,0.00002280641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194208,0.00001182143,0.0006577182,0.00007993859,0.00003185204,0.000001277015,0.01262459,0.000002376465,0.00001350744,0.9821234,0.003213859,0.001207696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004795287,0.0006745338,0.0009082233,0.000008809892,0.00003335248,6.256084e-7,0.001849726,0.000226438,0.0006028049,0.0100719,0.9849889,0.0001551003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2157484,0.0004663883,0.000350179,0.003432601,0.001693253,0.000859562,0.0008584723,0.0002209225,0.7763702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997399,0.000007468931,0.0002201505,0.001317745,0.0006326623,0.00002181598,0.0000266705,0.000003805646,0.0003706473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1821997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1071094438901168,"score_gpt":0.2549060210918069,"score_spread":0.1477965772016901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}