{"id":"W3008474305","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12220","title":"Total factor productivity change in hog production and Quebec's revenue insurance program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Total factor productivity; Economics; Revenue; Returns to scale; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Productivity; Production (economics); Volatility (finance); Economies of scale; Production–possibility frontier; Econometrics; Agricultural science; Microeconomics; Finance; Macroeconomics; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001439051,0.0001649596,0.0002186311,0.001172074,0.0005120377,0.001307991,0.0005087098,0.0002558642,0.003713436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004679801,0.00008122066,0.0004506067,0.001989876,0.0003510945,0.0002858603,0.0002998681,0.0004654391,0.0001381757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03334031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01147625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992647,0.000162141,0.0000249773,0.0001000456,0.0002336942,0.0002144153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966587,0.001224335,0.0005354362,0.0001239827,0.001211462,0.0002459959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003174251,0.0002750393,0.8328801,0.0001127201,0.0003557766,0.0003349139,0.0003902204,0.1017488,0.001124248,0.00842649,0.005875417,0.0481588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000163005,0.00006917533,0.9427029,0.00003206082,0.000053096,0.00002435628,0.0005237327,0.05017951,0.0005058999,0.0003865131,0.005484371,0.00002215711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789605,0.000301505,0.001456812,0.0005087859,0.00001329965,0.00005717265,0.006327446,0.00003031188,0.01234419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946609,0.00006180278,0.0004282119,0.00002524542,0.000002661523,0.0000162569,0.001080269,0.000003948742,0.003720732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03334031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.241902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08841959718138637,"score_gpt":0.253324222249226,"score_spread":0.1649046250678396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}