{"id":"W3008635429","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2019-0178","title":"Evaluating policy-relevant surrogate taxa for biodiversity conservation: a case study from British Columbia, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Taxon; Habitat; Biology; Pairwise comparison; Biodiversity; Ecology; Umbrella species; Environmental resource management; Endangered species; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861853,0.0003903174,0.0004377215,0.001665835,0.005717641,0.002651955,0.001632069,0.00122304,0.002552046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01101568,0.0002596138,0.0003198089,0.004857424,0.00166381,0.0007582577,0.001318036,0.001347177,0.0001508938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06475591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05504408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977064,0.0008006599,0.00009165513,0.0001510596,0.0005805558,0.0006695722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933704,0.002927237,0.0003366448,0.0002777677,0.002101236,0.0009866931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001254859,0.001558378,0.6260387,0.0008361374,0.0004157032,0.01799943,0.01463866,0.07190125,0.002808324,0.03494275,0.04763684,0.1799689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005075813,0.0005992337,0.6751165,0.000996976,0.0003931145,0.002076702,0.1130054,0.122642,0.001958441,0.009913221,0.07244873,0.0003420542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805855,0.0008937519,0.001132587,0.002239473,0.0000166521,0.0002136528,0.001070217,0.00002535756,0.01382291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919343,0.0007472243,0.00265104,0.0003369809,0.000005801279,0.00006711365,0.0006298767,0.00001245752,0.003615211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06475591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4698392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1429592904987045,"score_gpt":0.2341230632083451,"score_spread":0.09116377270964054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}