{"id":"W3009238663","doi":"10.1111/dom.14017","title":"Can the cardiovascular risk reductions observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA‐REG OUTCOME trial be explained by concomitant changes seen in conventional cardiovascular risk factor levels?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Toronto; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Empagliflozin; Medicine; Internal medicine; Cardiology; Myocardial infarction; Risk factor; Heart failure; Type 2 diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Relative risk; Hazard ratio; Confidence interval; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03740431,0.0007212397,0.001521913,0.0001559282,0.0001324508,0.001043046,0.00105929,0.000941529,0.002198099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610898,0.0004730715,0.004627407,0.0001603619,0.0005538104,0.000830019,0.0004630105,0.001497172,0.0002747542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003767074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009895359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008156671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006607705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990792,0.007420741,0.0002238485,0.0008245677,0.000481593,0.0002572949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698597,0.02634157,0.001619004,0.001630896,0.0003476982,0.0002012075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.3526669,0.003770818,0.1616855,0.003424647,0.04974956,0.001327286,0.0007729749,0.2831693,0.01365906,0.008809885,0.007580934,0.1133833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05410651,0.07358512,0.2030311,0.0004553288,0.03424101,0.00082592,0.0003128301,0.5790045,0.01813614,0.02450928,0.01151354,0.0002786934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.951939,0.002229096,0.0381411,0.001454664,0.000309117,0.0006868804,0.001099993,0.0002402628,0.00389974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946216,0.0001840669,0.003282921,0.0005195871,0.00005119701,0.0003281145,0.0003848775,0.00002842418,0.0005990698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03740431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1978153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05443718887107603,"score_gpt":0.2397831715192204,"score_spread":0.1853459826481443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}