{"id":"W3009573714","doi":"10.82308/10977","title":"An evaluation of NCRP Report No. 151 - radiation shielding design for radiotherapy facilities, and a feasibility study for 6 MV open-door treatments in an existing high-energy radiation therapy bunker","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Bunker; Electromagnetic shielding; Radiation therapy; Radiation shielding; Radiation protection; Medical physics; Medicine; Nuclear engineering; Radiation; Nuclear medicine; Engineering; Physics; Radiology; Waste management; Electrical engineering; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01042397,0.000551885,0.0003582933,0.0008181366,0.0009042279,0.0008332573,0.001448364,0.0007449666,0.002068042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01050261,0.0003141437,0.0007081028,0.0007274079,0.0005706417,0.0008379502,0.0006097598,0.0005052362,0.0004923748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004273032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00589875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01784402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904157,0.002525853,0.0003260188,0.0003985336,0.006022271,0.0003117065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913129,0.002581189,0.001429057,0.001124737,0.003259757,0.000292316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002833809,0.002152054,0.06403816,0.001926405,0.0001363228,0.0006821438,0.002167322,0.2965784,0.3181887,0.0162071,0.01269687,0.2823928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001088609,0.03651853,0.3436187,0.0006695591,0.0005007356,0.002687532,0.004420951,0.1633255,0.3373154,0.00437252,0.1049925,0.0004893563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475698,0.001243486,0.1110099,0.001018993,0.000128839,0.003778533,0.001326253,0.0007535791,0.03317079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8765149,0.0007541031,0.1134633,0.0002175739,0.00003086189,0.00100846,0.001358666,0.0001309454,0.006521281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05512792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0756481891320847,"score_gpt":0.3649939989080245,"score_spread":0.2893458097759398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}