{"id":"W3009642958","doi":"10.1017/cem.2019.472","title":"Evaluating the potential impact of an emergency department extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR) program: a health records review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Medicine; Interquartile range; Emergency department; Retrospective cohort study; Ventricular fibrillation; Refractory (planetary science); Resuscitation; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Emergency medicine; Internal medicine; Ventricular tachycardia; Intensive care medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01465548,0.0002853571,0.001049831,0.01037561,0.0008466602,0.00241878,0.001232028,0.001557044,0.002018898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107119,0.000599992,0.002123003,0.01256282,0.0008367467,0.003072289,0.001426017,0.001527512,0.0002854388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005030991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02096144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03384542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08730073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9802151,0.005154853,0.008964505,0.0009446176,0.004212142,0.000508804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7855536,0.1297977,0.05393461,0.003025981,0.02562812,0.002059925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007770549,0.0003545581,0.4288673,0.2545076,0.007387282,0.001451004,0.002618791,0.0004681017,0.000279946,0.001822086,0.02344694,0.2780195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002970773,0.0005635035,0.5735944,0.3406214,0.01592642,0.002280172,0.006713455,0.0004048899,0.0005178801,0.0003398719,0.05859258,0.0001483113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06706741,0.9078623,0.0003911743,0.009976551,0.0004382126,0.000653455,0.008525864,0.0000207231,0.005064295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2814906,0.7043848,0.002155429,0.005567812,0.0003546257,0.0004067568,0.005298312,0.00001750573,0.0003242058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03384542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07750654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1655483123365333,"score_gpt":0.4247981159330831,"score_spread":0.2592498035965498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}