{"id":"W3010460716","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0229927","title":"Stochastic disturbance regimes alter patterns of ecosystem variability and recovery","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Laurentian University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Stochastic modelling; Ecology; Psychological resilience; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Regime shift; Environmental science; Stochastic process; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135408,0.0002770091,0.0002808323,0.0005299056,0.000214535,0.000785261,0.0003336491,0.000463113,0.0005806654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006360782,0.0001974759,0.0004757504,0.0003586672,0.0005699361,0.0007101988,0.0006493175,0.0003671752,0.00008202594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007677133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003152403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005132922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00657073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993741,0.0002402775,0.00006423965,0.0001503105,0.00007420366,0.00009691937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971941,0.00132913,0.0008436249,0.000358404,0.000137536,0.0001372066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002794928,0.0001623294,0.340079,0.00005000084,0.0003052187,0.0002192332,0.0002038015,0.6351784,0.01237075,0.002227113,0.0002447354,0.008679987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001839299,0.0001440812,0.1540658,0.00001560051,0.0000514682,0.0001222087,0.0001974084,0.8393742,0.002056045,0.003689532,0.0002297025,0.0000355804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945697,0.00001778742,0.004737494,0.00004942737,0.000003575306,0.00001019895,0.00006660574,0.00005047102,0.0004945926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994918,0.000009489055,0.0004003712,0.000006764759,6.364076e-7,0.000003316685,0.0000390458,0.000003045533,0.00004554863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005132922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01020604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01304784619994921,"score_gpt":0.1795223490835271,"score_spread":0.1664745028835779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}