{"id":"W3010460716","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0229927","title":"Stochastic disturbance regimes alter patterns of ecosystem variability and recovery","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Laurentian University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Ecosystem; Stochastic modelling; Ecology; Psychological resilience; Variance (accounting); Econometrics; Regime shift; Environmental science; Stochastic process; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001604245,0.00008823782,0.0002091596,0.000007037883,0.0000377858,0.00001256001,0.0001502925,0.00003645543,0.0001912981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008988985,0.00007466672,0.00002623237,0.0000720585,0.00004160456,0.00009679054,0.0001531526,0.00006782487,0.00004459237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003884804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004606414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004974371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000432487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999081,0.00005360874,0.0002067194,0.0002999341,0.0002231843,0.0001355808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.0000879129,0.0001012602,0.0002021788,0.000007339251,0.0001014427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009627282,0.001002652,0.9515909,0.001777913,0.000139954,0.0000124694,0.00137447,0.003469032,0.0391286,0.0003682178,0.0001100026,0.0009295173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001282696,0.001067938,0.5578892,0.001337285,0.0002749382,0.00001383048,0.000312214,0.421712,0.01351484,0.001431545,0.00009241653,0.001071076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949006,0.0000273565,0.003312653,0.0003994766,0.00002261617,0.0002351999,0.00006536344,0.00001779934,0.001018971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992881,0.00001513248,0.0004343176,0.00009735213,0.00002419751,0.00001116507,0.000002315915,0.000007835707,0.0001196186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.418243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01304784619994921,"score_gpt":0.1795223490835271,"score_spread":0.1664745028835779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}