{"id":"W3010812996","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0224119","title":"Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency; Petroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Occupancy; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Inference; Sampling design; Environmental data; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0280783,0.0008559007,0.0008750448,0.00100616,0.001333554,0.00197536,0.002595488,0.00155547,0.0007568864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06592581,0.0004779751,0.001206163,0.001587864,0.001544101,0.002254428,0.001959167,0.001417729,0.0001934045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002315523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001811136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02750259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04110032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905146,0.006364959,0.0004633714,0.001564923,0.0008263065,0.000265862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9252452,0.0631647,0.003099062,0.003947818,0.003988236,0.0005549961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005801311,0.0006988129,0.3260905,0.0005189419,0.0005199215,0.001271386,0.002893918,0.6030388,0.006745307,0.01132987,0.001513111,0.04479934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004210354,0.0002735796,0.02150082,0.00009433836,0.00008448962,0.000253259,0.001194055,0.9617949,0.004437198,0.008236275,0.002012328,0.00007668666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359003,0.0001870577,0.1605425,0.0005312383,0.00002761466,0.0002187221,0.000682409,0.0002489537,0.001661114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8205399,0.0001205599,0.1779161,0.0001606494,0.00001119657,0.0001943549,0.0006477048,0.0001048602,0.0003046899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0280783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.148494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2305348326224065,"score_gpt":0.2690841617638297,"score_spread":0.03854932914142314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}