{"id":"W3010812996","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0224119","title":"Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency; Petroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Occupancy; Biodiversity; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Inference; Sampling design; Environmental data; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000140428,0.0003053551,0.0003728514,0.00004034412,0.0006718583,0.00006324389,0.0002862597,0.0000429914,0.0006589544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002487693,0.0002908882,0.00006185283,0.0003002528,0.0003081786,0.0005125576,0.001540042,0.0002155382,0.0001335097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002809946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007122732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002800498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008283636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978022,0.0001091765,0.0002195935,0.0006556904,0.0008379059,0.0003754321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993033,0.00004871234,0.0001553653,0.0002708109,0.00001407065,0.0002077076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000782903,0.003136286,0.9828473,0.00003307432,0.000333385,0.001144998,0.001799475,0.00223297,0.008303702,3.635712e-7,0.00003436431,0.00005583627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0105667,0.003116322,0.6818273,0.0001260349,0.003260437,0.00007745039,0.05098531,0.2206096,0.02722715,0.000008000315,0.00002991144,0.002165789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966625,0.000008992233,0.001823908,0.0001022844,0.00001438105,0.0007654006,0.0001798658,0.0001051869,0.0003374709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8899475,0.000005871529,0.1096902,0.000249718,0.00001514113,0.000009453414,0.00002238088,0.000013432,0.00004629552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3010199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2305348326224065,"score_gpt":0.2690841617638297,"score_spread":0.03854932914142314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}