{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004321017,0.0001715021,0.0002695577,0.0001599923,0.001391484,0.0001383218,0.000141117,0.00008810005,0.00008898629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002674796,0.0001706025,0.00005389249,0.0002791566,0.001256043,0.0004109627,0.00007923077,0.0002274182,0.00004610396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009221509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008970363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8607503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984767,0.0002625353,0.0002991688,0.0003666303,0.0002271072,0.0003678073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992409,0.0002418123,0.0000822176,0.0001179371,0.0001231883,0.0001939798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001923002,0.0001013698,0.2010141,0.00002002678,0.00006595158,0.000767984,0.06998353,0.001074023,0.00001841567,0.72634,0.00009531811,0.0005000515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003448111,0.0002368016,0.02752107,0.0003556854,0.0001524376,0.001828894,0.8168555,0.001803185,0.000006249007,0.0004458045,0.1460778,0.00126842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622471,0.0003927368,0.00001695718,0.001873917,0.0005696077,0.001244461,0.00002506177,0.00003311981,0.03359707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998835,0.00003703458,0.00008959409,0.0001300664,0.0001036509,0.00008955681,0.00001052693,0.000004858412,0.0006997212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.746872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02232925096033907,"score_gpt":0.2901181291519193,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}