{"id":"W3010980273","doi":"","title":"Legal Pluralism and Caron v Alberta: A Canadian Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional interpretation; Pluralism (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006615684,0.0005568272,0.0006980008,0.002906513,0.07215599,0.01148062,0.004074156,0.01312812,0.006575083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01477144,0.0008497459,0.0006848661,0.007059579,0.02587008,0.003114242,0.006335165,0.01220824,0.0002642258],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2057952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2962323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897224,0.001632966,0.0001474395,0.0007122066,0.0025624,0.005222567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914756,0.004524317,0.0004748378,0.0002964219,0.001806689,0.001422213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023951,0.0002033967,0.02496969,0.0001968227,0.00005725656,0.01185167,0.2413179,0.001605564,0.0006863617,0.6384003,0.04932829,0.03114335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001500269,0.00006435026,0.04466572,0.00072471,0.0001879438,0.002978437,0.5003238,0.001994532,0.001008553,0.04443615,0.4031605,0.0003054306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5517377,0.005427677,0.001000392,0.06344546,0.0002410806,0.0001750947,0.0002807853,0.00003283932,0.3776589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448119,0.002154164,0.0008783247,0.00730922,0.00004469568,0.00005436713,0.00006211088,0.0000318326,0.04465334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2057952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.921165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02232925096033907,"score_gpt":0.2901181291519193,"score_spread":0.2677888781915802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}