{"id":"W3012193018","doi":"10.1038/s41565-020-0656-y","title":"Banning carbon nanotubes would be scientifically unjustified and damaging to innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature Nanotechnology","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Eye Institute; Weill Cornell Medical College; Peking University; Institut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia; Silesian University of Technology; Universiteit Antwerpen; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Montréal; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Lehigh University; Università degli Studi di Padova; Université de Bordeaux; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Monash University; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; Dublin City University; University of Manchester; National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; Texas Christian University; University of Nebraska-Lincoln; National Institute on Drug Abuse; University of North Carolina at Greensboro; Université de Strasbourg; Rice University; University of Tokyo; Pennsylvania State University; Carnegie Mellon University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Carbon nanotube; Nanotechnology; Carbon fibers; Materials science; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005433112,0.0007321869,0.0009480678,0.002046534,0.0003223899,0.0003934155,0.001602389,0.007755379,0.00005553167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002167541,0.0007395587,0.00008982907,0.003454577,0.0005817312,0.000145024,0.001442743,0.01038083,0.00004442714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002637249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002292679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003970007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000765918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949796,0.0001423393,0.0008551595,0.00204067,0.0009652456,0.00101697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974145,0.0003759476,0.0003899254,0.001219605,0.000506961,0.00009311012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000296387,0.000009818315,0.00002104834,0.0001298545,0.00001734114,0.0003766757,0.0001042672,0.000005499469,0.7418495,0.001541935,0.2549268,0.0009876324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002291003,0.0001000838,0.000005524074,0.0001558017,0.0000615649,0.00008965146,0.00002019638,0.000157541,0.4930896,0.001275581,0.5042297,0.00058565],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.253611,0.0008794944,0.0002032275,0.7386481,0.004390504,0.0006794005,0.0001004421,0.001094497,0.0003933641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2420945,0.00001963807,0.008276431,0.7464702,0.002048405,0.0001002264,0.0002213316,0.0001708751,0.0005984876],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2493029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01579475163508915,"score_gpt":0.2659478676707098,"score_spread":0.2501531160356207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}