{"id":"W3012317091","doi":"10.1017/s0260210520000017","title":"Democratising food: The case for a deliberative approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Sheffield","keywords":"Deliberation; Political science; Food sovereignty; Food security; Deliberative democracy; Scope (computer science); Food systems; Sustainability; Status quo; Economic Justice; Democracy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000155428,0.00009259422,0.0002032913,0.000001829002,0.0001487084,0.00001404904,0.0001758609,0.00001530005,0.00002256539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000313345,0.00002210917,0.0001036895,0.0001206527,0.00003261273,0.00005266091,0.00009132174,0.00004314015,0.000003074999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001928504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000371518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005575426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003051841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993528,0.00003695866,0.0002499775,0.0001417851,0.0001374277,0.0000810382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992931,0.000225385,0.0001324271,0.00001666755,0.0003061086,0.00002627442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008410756,0.0002041921,0.001627255,0.004297583,0.002454647,0.00004172995,0.003301588,0.00002254555,0.0008944655,0.05593999,0.4253192,0.5058128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007760875,0.001319062,0.01692469,0.006095071,0.0003674201,0.0006286108,0.01312576,0.0005456706,0.00310066,0.01196951,0.9441451,0.001002364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.319665,0.589297,0.0004197578,0.08373316,0.0004092786,0.002632868,0.0003465404,0.0000748345,0.003421564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8210602,0.1608306,0.004237946,0.01226413,0.0008721736,0.0003834305,0.0001538952,0.000001752602,0.0001958582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1143759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09147359015003784,"score_gpt":0.3015435000842151,"score_spread":0.2100699099341773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}