{"id":"W3013087228","doi":"","title":"Humanity, Forest Ecology, and the Future in a British Columbia Valley:A Case Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Ecology; Geography; Environmental ethics; Political science; Biology; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004445023,0.0001507354,0.0005743106,0.00007876048,0.00219631,0.002080882,0.001219114,0.0001286217,0.004187883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002461618,0.0001413176,0.0001022776,0.0004619878,0.00113516,0.0008690223,0.0009593828,0.0004090935,0.000004043062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001633205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003559164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2407099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974787,0.0006860509,0.0005865758,0.000345998,0.0004535948,0.0004490959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998605,0.0006067613,0.0003864881,0.0001615214,0.00007631215,0.0001639164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003988138,0.0004881302,0.9788778,0.000007243576,0.00008555144,0.001160192,0.005308416,0.000003349583,0.00002715264,0.00004798144,0.008983177,0.00497115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00109896,0.00002428896,0.9038488,0.00002574775,0.00004729283,0.00009945195,0.08552309,6.316772e-7,0.00000187682,0.003125509,0.006024096,0.0001802195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815065,0.01018622,8.77904e-7,0.0002973851,0.0003516238,0.001245322,0.000007357684,0.00001799405,0.006386742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799786,0.01858045,0.00001723608,0.0003563682,0.0002887683,0.00006183821,0.000001073592,0.00001191362,0.0007037954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1566806128338673,"score_gpt":0.4959652577304475,"score_spread":0.3392846448965802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}