{"id":"W3013159354","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.1453","title":"Influence of local density and sex ratio on pollination in an ambophilous flowering plant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Foraging; Pollinator; Pollination; Anemophily; Sex ratio; Pollen; Mating; Generalist and specialist species; Sexual dimorphism; Density ratio; Optimal foraging theory; Sex allocation; Ecology; Botany; Zoology; Demography; Offspring; Population; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001346345,0.0001607419,0.0002323731,0.0003373795,0.000183961,0.0002841184,0.0001875367,0.0001583587,0.000913683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004523631,0.0001367284,0.0001281754,0.0001236583,0.0002463561,0.0001702624,0.0003392266,0.0002148584,0.00009700988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002131026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006888889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008503801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002076328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998825,0.00003350809,0.000011003,0.00003551745,0.00002416007,0.00001337302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993699,0.0002588739,0.0001981736,0.00003321083,0.0000377058,0.0001021907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004164953,0.00009077635,0.2201345,0.0001090033,0.00007902265,0.0002279505,0.0002806105,0.0002420816,0.7710617,0.0000691301,0.00007114634,0.007217529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009675974,0.0002449528,0.9891102,0.000004438907,0.00003062732,0.000216088,0.0001136833,0.000877857,0.009189345,0.00003717382,0.0001580789,0.000007851949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999638,0.00004909826,0.0001334291,0.000004953195,4.817718e-7,0.000002784478,0.00002904779,0.000003487924,0.0001388435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996738,0.00002354636,0.0001899993,0.000008004367,0.000001303011,0.000004016355,0.00003900464,0.000001919208,0.00005828454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.000913683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003056586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02190138780440346,"score_gpt":0.2107233004492506,"score_spread":0.1888219126448471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}