{"id":"W3013212602","doi":"10.1002/rrq.306","title":"The Capaciousness of No: Affective Refusals as Literacy Practices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre of Excellence for Coherent X-Ray Science, Australian Research Council; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Literacy; Feeling; Silence; Psychology; Normative; Gesture; Humanism; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Communication; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006471785,0.00009325961,0.0001705221,0.00006883896,0.001698601,0.0005790564,0.0006448964,0.0001068429,0.00006947865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008836242,0.00006739522,0.00007347389,0.0005293551,0.0009422959,0.0005965985,0.00004114775,0.000775832,0.0003786647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001001181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006691114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005541885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958258,0.001854176,0.0002081068,0.0002856547,0.001258139,0.0005681248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992065,0.006169429,0.0002762545,0.0002524736,0.001001211,0.0002355939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002540942,0.0001374132,0.0004845427,0.0001063256,0.00009785125,0.00004753788,0.5021801,2.584243e-7,0.02592194,0.4068179,0.003714199,0.06023784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005681099,0.004682472,0.001162587,0.000326478,0.00002501072,0.00000472802,0.1218217,0.0002558747,0.005960096,0.1038001,0.760954,0.0004387257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7592162,0.0003016834,0.00003096947,0.03406413,0.0002381676,0.0006694213,0.00001126203,0.00008070217,0.2053874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972033,0.0001882129,0.00003815605,0.000104131,0.0004739349,0.00003019361,0.00000131833,0.00001481652,0.00194592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1268269760009444,"score_gpt":0.4858600084205216,"score_spread":0.3590330324195772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}