{"id":"W3013528058","doi":"10.1111/faf.12458","title":"Tuna trade‐offs: Balancing profit and social benefits in one of the world’s largest fisheries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Tuna; Subsidy; Fishing; Profit (economics); Fishery; Business; Fisheries management; Sustainability; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001292767,0.0001431168,0.0002472082,0.00002066567,0.0001795817,0.0000788283,0.000200947,0.00007324962,0.001911902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007092329,0.0001173231,0.00003866046,0.0003698348,0.0005440923,0.0003165282,0.000471221,0.0002409823,0.000002308193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002195377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001415834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003947107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004863112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988486,0.00005553883,0.0002336919,0.0002850264,0.0002771156,0.0003000877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996776,0.0000501098,0.00006261557,0.0001169552,0.000005762281,0.00008697585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005627982,0.00001741266,0.9712803,0.00008504013,0.000007844419,0.000002683171,0.002541845,6.552917e-7,0.0001829537,0.0001456652,0.008953606,0.01672571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003409531,0.00007129732,0.906772,0.00001163998,0.000006770017,0.00000183389,0.0004686637,0.00009569764,0.0004040531,0.0001230742,0.09155794,0.0001460242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803456,0.00003107185,0.000001742646,0.04435111,0.00004195332,0.0002731871,0.00005109904,0.00002338431,0.07488079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962853,0.00009050918,0.0001334648,0.002351028,0.0000732727,0.00002564505,0.000009248508,0.00001669687,0.001014845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1159396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02798354028277078,"score_gpt":0.2122312192927686,"score_spread":0.1842476790099978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}