{"id":"W3013951041","doi":"10.3390/jrfm13040064","title":"Improving Many Volatility Forecasts Using Cross-Sectional Volatility Clusters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Financial models with long-tailed distributions and volatility clustering; Forward volatility; Univariate; Autoregressive model; Stochastic volatility; Volatility clustering; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Multivariate statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390059,0.0002214643,0.0005468475,0.0002097672,0.0003211293,0.0001539447,0.0002396647,0.0001424654,0.00005827071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000481227,0.0002414989,0.0002754931,0.0002873086,0.0000911067,0.000584574,0.0001903405,0.0004560387,0.00000881609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001404153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003731455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002435355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001470085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976674,0.00003172748,0.001407545,0.0004308136,0.0001333705,0.00032914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983604,0.00004920462,0.001085967,0.0001820501,0.0001244872,0.0001978866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003972137,0.00007029473,0.9554496,0.0001568644,0.00003078966,0.00001875115,0.0006439236,0.001110377,0.000007790088,0.007147868,0.00006332323,0.03490316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009690315,0.0001366157,0.6117648,0.00001983707,0.00002619174,0.000007063204,0.00004878469,0.3675069,0.000006379416,0.0134278,0.005874501,0.0002121049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6119916,0.0008979505,0.3861704,0.00003647926,0.0004520661,0.0001371492,0.00006285703,0.00001078199,0.0002407516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891503,0.0003286355,0.009781471,0.0001823417,0.0005101361,0.000002066389,0.000002267655,0.0000191588,0.00002354788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3771588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04230456743500152,"score_gpt":0.243627030074791,"score_spread":0.2013224626397895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}