{"id":"W3014001896","doi":"10.3897/bdj.8.e32765","title":"Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity Data Journal","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Database; Ontology; Global biodiversity; Computer science; Geography; Field (mathematics); Data science; Environmental resource management; World Wide Web; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003606275,0.0001263055,0.0001935852,0.00002409293,0.0004412232,0.00005486862,0.001102455,0.00004252871,0.03399257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008290683,0.0001110348,0.00005001582,0.0002210397,0.0002618466,0.0009491427,0.002459411,0.0002103094,0.0009402618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001685075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002232809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009508395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003305264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998668,0.0001357524,0.0001884872,0.0003826598,0.0004073369,0.0002178064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988879,0.00001540235,0.0001500716,0.0004880313,0.00002489033,0.0004337115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001269675,0.0008735324,0.825897,0.00000592895,0.0000416268,0.006489983,0.00199048,0.000001998455,0.0001478169,0.000004556176,0.163567,0.0008530212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003535848,0.001695902,0.6615997,0.000004725616,0.0003677013,0.005118884,0.2398696,0.0001220888,0.0002306206,0.000002029422,0.08685835,0.0005945815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756542,0.00001774879,0.0001483337,0.0007636496,0.00009174982,0.0001353299,0.02288428,0.00002541261,0.0002792802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966949,0.00004068038,0.0002366086,0.0005967257,0.00002909451,1.947594e-7,0.002398523,0.000001318092,0.000001915596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2378791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2780765962087791,"score_gpt":0.3189801793062666,"score_spread":0.04090358309748754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}