{"id":"W3014178055","doi":"10.1101/2020.03.30.20047613","title":"TRENDS IN ACCESS TO WATER AND SANITATION IN MALAWI: PROGRESS AND INEQUALITIES (1992-2017)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"medRxiv","topic":"Child Nutrition and Water Access","field":"Nursing","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sanitation; Improved sanitation; Geography; Population; Context (archaeology); Open defecation; Inequality; Psychological intervention; Water supply; Millennium Development Goals; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Rural area; Environmental health; Business; Developing country; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008383192,0.0002226814,0.0002148312,0.001281952,0.0003745352,0.0008297398,0.0002947089,0.0001936937,0.002196366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002072962,0.0001486276,0.0002639146,0.002425557,0.0002645522,0.0008799445,0.0009552243,0.0007434418,0.0003057294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001053679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001337692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05979068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07663926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995894,0.00008061554,0.00006482405,0.0000518235,0.00007171804,0.0001415951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998792,0.0001082304,0.0005350546,0.00003365527,0.0003898788,0.0001412319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005288076,0.0000300551,0.980839,0.0002562315,0.00007658599,0.00006980366,0.001452236,0.00009965785,0.0001947343,0.0003245811,0.003053384,0.01355087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001931143,0.00002594048,0.9948651,0.0001583202,0.00003482028,0.00006087156,0.001098733,0.0001805361,0.0001011374,0.00005719456,0.003409898,0.000005462419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710615,0.003731921,0.0003050649,0.001752524,0.00004252995,0.00004265124,0.02099121,0.00001999603,0.002052662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903943,0.001588146,0.0003255091,0.0001318202,0.00003676328,0.0000461693,0.006630091,0.000004807214,0.0008423851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05979068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1188853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07639766942655662,"score_gpt":0.3518454098005332,"score_spread":0.2754477403739766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}