{"id":"W3014557966","doi":"10.1515/jem-2019-0029","title":"Identification of Non-Equilibrium Beliefs in Games of Incomplete Information Using Experimental Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Econometric Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Matching (statistics); Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Complete information; Rationalizability; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003125088,0.00008187167,0.0004469363,0.0006930276,0.00004357292,0.00003673944,0.0005838997,0.00005233415,0.00007740985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009246593,0.00008753385,0.0000823044,0.0009362699,0.0001533546,0.002089691,0.0002477393,0.0001041635,0.000002181922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002083562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000148903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003378359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006535732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979056,0.0002240052,0.001471291,0.0001094058,0.0001602978,0.0001293922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975629,0.0002397388,0.00181545,0.0001753401,0.0001207813,0.00008572821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003409753,0.000784227,0.1302364,0.000297659,0.000343183,0.000004498849,0.1251829,0.003805839,0.6747078,0.003578578,0.0004251344,0.06029286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004331987,0.001305554,0.06968761,0.000209197,0.0001748499,0.00001316358,0.1510688,0.05433161,0.7127662,0.00128025,0.003949306,0.000881551],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925918,0.001062163,0.004515511,0.0002105586,0.0003527817,0.0001610452,0.00003564189,0.000002606938,0.001067872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182428,0.00009782873,0.08153124,0.00003518757,0.00008079504,0.000001080675,0.000003365778,0.00000490945,0.000002803818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07701574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3569527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2448318482841166,"score_gpt":0.4821901653592673,"score_spread":0.2373583170751506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}