{"id":"W3016591706","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v6i2.402","title":"A centroid-based modelling approach to lens inversion for gravitationally lensed systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Astronomy and Astrophysical Research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"European Space Agency","keywords":"Centroid; Gravitational lens; Lens (geology); Through-the-lens metering; Inversion (geology); Computer science; Physics; Software; Coordinate system; Quasar; Computer vision; Optics; Artificial intelligence; Galaxy; Astrophysics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026786,0.001114143,0.00109583,0.002246094,0.001179267,0.002181537,0.002883828,0.0012726,0.003062726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004039898,0.0007776049,0.00126759,0.002024208,0.0008191469,0.002725876,0.001931099,0.00174466,0.001848606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001644348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002036556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02141275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01845674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992155,0.0001336458,0.00004029018,0.0002035699,0.0003297198,0.00007727952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989167,0.0002747947,0.0002017524,0.0002306006,0.0003136839,0.00006252754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001722336,0.00008578137,0.005405708,0.0002000698,0.0002322262,0.000325248,0.0004528138,0.5460371,0.03371547,0.104462,0.004088137,0.3048232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001179813,0.00002974344,0.0006473184,0.00001018843,0.00001811273,0.0001116451,0.00005377845,0.977413,0.004135214,0.01243507,0.00509219,0.00004184142],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002124106,0.00007546489,0.9964104,0.00005551949,0.00001947615,0.00001532729,0.00004634714,0.0004020869,0.0008512631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1553851,0.0003437104,0.8396385,0.00008845307,0.0001556705,0.00008436693,0.0004421097,0.0004520286,0.003410005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02141275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04257625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06748588151385554,"score_gpt":0.2780888497911781,"score_spread":0.2106029682773226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}