{"id":"W3016785321","doi":"10.1093/mnras/staa2055","title":"On the distribution of fluxes of gamma-ray blazars: hints for a stochastic process?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","topic":"Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels","keywords":"Physics; Blazar; Astrophysics; Supermassive black hole; Accretion (finance); Stochastic differential equation; Power law; Gamma ray; Stochastic process; High-energy astronomy; Distribution (mathematics); Statistical physics; Galaxy; Quantum mechanics; Cosmic ray; Mathematical analysis; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001944191,0.0004195267,0.0008000981,0.0008634239,0.0005162444,0.002000372,0.001747153,0.001455538,0.002466991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252194,0.0004687563,0.0008374901,0.0006181835,0.001875025,0.002319269,0.0006081742,0.0009480421,0.0003407985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001201461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000357641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004615461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002894979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996183,0.0001180422,0.0000145606,0.0001174454,0.00005881587,0.0000727919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962506,0.002173366,0.0007553519,0.0003640034,0.0002624657,0.0001943268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002102017,0.0001244782,0.05578749,0.0001019511,0.0001057845,0.0009268252,0.0004280605,0.4970955,0.01256802,0.4225582,0.001889273,0.008204179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003150345,0.00003269411,0.01437721,0.00001910074,0.00001930114,0.0002900614,0.00006697963,0.9236467,0.0007100682,0.06021914,0.0005418347,0.00004534663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.819309,0.0003159044,0.1737849,0.001819899,0.00003900911,0.00003502004,0.0004402615,0.0002909398,0.003965109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964364,0.0001159223,0.002379071,0.00006424444,0.00003878811,0.00001540451,0.0001135707,0.00003527994,0.0008013422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004615461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01028198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009246429212661486,"score_gpt":0.2070211850498894,"score_spread":0.1977747558372279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}