{"id":"W3017253864","doi":"10.1080/00085030.2020.1748284","title":"Comparing jury focus and comprehension of expert evidence between adversarial and court-appointed models in Canadian criminal court context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Jury; Context (archaeology); Criminal case; Criminal court; Law; Focus (optics); Comprehension; Criminology; Psychology; Jury instructions; Political science; Computer science; History; International law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002228971,0.0001593715,0.0004617638,0.0002913037,0.0009228804,0.0001831929,0.0006094346,0.000130928,0.00002678694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007637234,0.0001640156,0.00008990214,0.0009330226,0.003213519,0.001073282,0.00008021345,0.0003893087,7.495082e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000656509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008277401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6781933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.838941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973295,0.00008564445,0.000525751,0.0003629431,0.000924898,0.0007712053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965208,0.0003064392,0.0002838443,0.0001262889,0.0006338888,0.002128803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001666139,0.00003217881,0.2126922,0.0001950059,0.00009979492,0.00009153064,0.4232856,0.0007039989,0.002369872,0.007616432,0.03573085,0.3170159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005240109,0.001020919,0.4488078,0.005139551,0.0002716177,0.0002175988,0.4207187,0.07511695,0.004391488,0.0163527,0.02068254,0.002039979],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983677,0.001873308,0.0004727284,0.01283355,0.0002289268,0.0002068246,0.00001665521,0.000008812018,0.0006822227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934521,0.0004974589,0.004961995,0.0009050965,0.0001678987,8.773845e-7,5.160441e-7,0.000008960088,0.000005116524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3149759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1354321480218602,"score_gpt":0.3449763169649397,"score_spread":0.2095441689430795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}