{"id":"W3017946359","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.3082","title":"Estimating arthropod survival probability from field counts: a case study with monarch butterflies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Nature Conservancy of Canada","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Pupa; Statistics; Danaus; Population; Bayesian probability; Ecology; Mark and recapture; Biology; Geography; Larva; Demography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006061518,0.00006823493,0.00009169709,0.000001254191,0.0001421444,0.00001110693,0.00005997697,0.00002326963,0.003796622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004317379,0.00005504577,0.00001200669,0.00005899069,0.00006626637,0.00007278365,0.00008092896,0.00009480547,0.000715762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002148688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005734121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000610757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009065469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995047,0.00003615754,0.00008975923,0.000193177,0.00008384546,0.00009234179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997394,0.0001003864,0.00003082936,0.00009034295,0.000005883736,0.00003313238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002546003,0.0001100913,0.9891483,0.000006204155,0.00003284311,0.0002944879,0.003184721,0.002853519,0.000002230655,0.00002010102,0.001975157,0.002346917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135556,0.003494598,0.7761111,0.00002866206,0.0001302202,0.0001135414,0.02649905,0.1833563,0.00003771775,0.004462127,0.002771046,0.0008601696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755542,0.00001792862,0.000964697,0.0006971635,0.00006836262,0.0001821617,0.000005127623,0.00003433384,0.02247607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933932,0.000001002414,0.006162992,0.0002295415,0.00003075717,0.00001790415,0.000001619335,0.000004855089,0.0001580837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2130372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01839746358383815,"score_gpt":0.2457843959536138,"score_spread":0.2273869323697757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}