{"id":"W3020842538","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118175","title":"A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; GDG Environnement","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Xylem; Embolism; Tracheid; Vulnerability (computing); Resistance (ecology); Trait; Environmental science; Biology; Ecology; Computer science; Botany; Medicine; Surgery; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001221778,0.0000507208,0.0001277942,0.00002768667,0.00002461637,0.00000435481,0.00009007108,0.00003078252,0.00004976237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008287403,0.00004750077,0.0000117393,0.0001237624,0.00004100438,0.00003381418,0.0001783815,0.00004361561,0.00001622947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002110397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001069323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002587866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005924882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999522,0.00004620328,0.0001347375,0.0001476598,0.0000469187,0.0001025359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998285,0.00002938996,0.00003478717,0.00006382775,0.000001374066,0.00004218406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005978715,0.00008515084,0.9135666,0.00003860466,0.00002213847,0.00001823297,0.001988024,0.05629848,0.0001394461,0.0238213,0.001945266,0.002016954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001918314,0.00004881314,0.9619413,0.000005710831,0.00001251841,1.946716e-7,0.0001122271,0.02066519,0.00002934315,0.002297164,0.01463495,0.00006077957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747752,0.00002578242,0.007288341,0.0009571349,0.00004054939,0.0002390151,0.000005104528,0.000008985564,0.0166599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969987,0.00002318363,0.02914344,0.0002985007,0.000003062246,0.00002558142,0.000004787795,0.00000258921,0.000511809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04837466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3306223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02373594822003933,"score_gpt":0.3060382191636405,"score_spread":0.2823022709436012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}