{"id":"W3021822959","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2014.06.002","title":"Considering affinity: an ethereal conversation (part one of three)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Endeavour","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Teleology; Natural (archaeology); Conversation; Organism; Function (biology); Chemistry; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Biology; Psychology; Linguistics; Evolutionary biology; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002778024,0.00006152617,0.0001116076,0.00004890862,0.0001792184,0.00003020975,0.0001090097,0.00002319679,0.00166458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002902806,0.0000611243,0.00003021262,0.00001347175,0.0003363936,0.0002598271,0.00001554169,0.00007198908,0.00006967096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001321045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002329966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002452576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001613555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994589,0.00003290368,0.0001297758,0.000123424,0.0001505046,0.000104474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996249,0.00004655928,0.00008163098,0.0001476717,0.00005084798,0.00004838684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132238,0.00006839669,0.0001781896,0.00001967023,0.00001071791,5.699029e-7,0.02330028,0.0000129446,0.001014108,0.9718624,0.0004952532,0.003024254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001013879,0.0007755992,0.002425518,0.00009786079,0.00005515626,0.000003572447,0.004717254,0.001333934,0.004247429,0.310271,0.6745508,0.0005079636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5075454,0.00004102646,0.0002456074,0.000824515,0.0007380131,0.00007919571,0.00001371073,0.00008544946,0.4904271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985774,0.000001961013,0.0001888127,0.0002125947,0.0005316303,0.00000190274,0.0000035665,0.000005785982,0.0004763699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6740556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1380781030702257,"score_gpt":0.2301694415917852,"score_spread":0.09209133852155951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}