{"id":"W3021822959","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2014.06.002","title":"Considering affinity: an ethereal conversation (part one of three)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Endeavour","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Teleology; Natural (archaeology); Conversation; Organism; Function (biology); Chemistry; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Biology; Psychology; Linguistics; Evolutionary biology; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02146623,0.0006967029,0.000907702,0.001504569,0.04002328,0.02031191,0.003850481,0.03424577,0.01035518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03373811,0.0007148468,0.001051884,0.002199362,0.05574841,0.03870166,0.01856477,0.04973163,0.001226052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01247976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007736292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01233151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01394407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9794272,0.01483709,0.000402424,0.001403101,0.001823328,0.002106892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681759,0.02495368,0.0008853814,0.001071588,0.001677469,0.003236061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000464009,0.00005455783,0.0003152349,0.0001207406,0.00001206364,0.0006770092,0.3369143,0.00008628481,0.0008493862,0.6200482,0.03401841,0.006857377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002225187,0.0000324732,0.0006303008,0.0004658028,0.00001075378,0.0006346055,0.400352,0.0003539638,0.0006904968,0.1639509,0.4327768,0.00007961015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04843838,0.006215023,0.01767427,0.7777813,0.008300072,0.0001015468,0.00007996394,0.00005620851,0.1413532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7571718,0.002490636,0.006470762,0.1938996,0.003433939,0.0002219982,0.00005625566,0.0003549195,0.03590018],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04002328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1135256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1380781030702257,"score_gpt":0.2301694415917852,"score_spread":0.09209133852155951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}