{"id":"W3022234717","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.1046","title":"Entropic Fragment Based Approach for Aptamer Design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biophysical Journal","topic":"Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment; Aptamer; Computational biology; DNA; Nucleic acid; Sequence (biology); SELEX Aptamer Technique; Entropy (arrow of time); Fragment (logic); RNA; Biology; Chemistry; Computer science; Algorithm; Genetics; Gene; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000339062,0.0005619148,0.0004817101,0.0003862587,0.0003068246,0.000404482,0.0006816039,0.0006413971,0.001759613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003756541,0.000285017,0.0003075644,0.0002296324,0.0002847163,0.0003676651,0.0004723625,0.000907787,0.0007036529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000521464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003240868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003852212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007489498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997668,0.0000385526,0.00001208639,0.00004010862,0.0001162203,0.0000263644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998633,0.00004655786,0.00002485661,0.00002286699,0.00002814738,0.00001423356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001311823,0.0000593103,0.000088987,0.00009491952,0.00001819487,0.000122564,0.00003388348,0.00995947,0.9598933,0.002572474,0.000198386,0.02682738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003735607,0.0004632978,0.0002497272,0.000009329937,0.00003588577,0.0004006718,0.00001249442,0.07149232,0.921758,0.00108246,0.004424676,0.00003373764],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2228112,0.001509372,0.7680452,0.0002513035,0.0000878724,0.0003212197,0.0001971075,0.0009863639,0.005790342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7190953,0.0008460993,0.2717544,0.0002062429,0.00002716021,0.0002504468,0.0003320001,0.0001100517,0.007378222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001759613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005886495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01375138715619981,"score_gpt":0.2677188913039099,"score_spread":0.2539675041477101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}