{"id":"W3022521945","doi":"10.1007/s11075-020-00926-5","title":"An optimal 13-point finite difference scheme for a 2D Helmholtz equation with a perfectly matched layer boundary condition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Numerical Algorithms","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Helmholtz equation; Theory of computation; Mathematical analysis; Perfectly matched layer; Scheme (mathematics); Boundary layer; Finite difference method; Layer (electronics); Finite difference; Blasius boundary layer; Finite difference scheme; Point (geometry); Boundary (topology); Boundary value problem; Geometry; Boundary layer thickness; Mechanics; Algorithm; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001257212,0.0002696716,0.0003579406,0.00005021912,0.000109846,0.00009621244,0.0001557512,0.0001186078,0.0003194843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001254194,0.0002370316,0.00008432881,0.0004042034,0.0000633107,0.000193348,0.00001639037,0.0002725408,0.00004163147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005960637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003746638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008333012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.449562e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985588,0.0000853348,0.0003043539,0.000384265,0.0002727462,0.0003944977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990152,0.0003241578,0.0000575967,0.000185613,0.00009579162,0.0003217025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001440813,0.0005698997,0.0009105272,0.000412286,0.0002885696,0.00003787569,0.003890801,0.2777516,0.2715056,0.0005318439,0.0005827221,0.4420774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106385,0.002029973,0.002726586,0.00001643795,0.00003393279,0.000006364743,0.00006638935,0.9835693,0.008736719,0.0002880364,0.001057892,0.0003619633],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1305379,0.00009446406,0.8676816,0.0005445167,0.00008318823,0.0003978452,0.00002761103,0.0004873603,0.0001454824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7066328,0.000006459227,0.2922091,0.0006336372,0.0002027562,0.0001388509,0.0001005976,0.00005394992,0.00002182173],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03341095265633933,"score_gpt":0.2884768538702902,"score_spread":0.2550659012139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}