{"id":"W3022521945","doi":"10.1007/s11075-020-00926-5","title":"An optimal 13-point finite difference scheme for a 2D Helmholtz equation with a perfectly matched layer boundary condition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Numerical Algorithms","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Helmholtz equation; Theory of computation; Mathematical analysis; Perfectly matched layer; Scheme (mathematics); Boundary layer; Finite difference method; Layer (electronics); Finite difference; Blasius boundary layer; Finite difference scheme; Point (geometry); Boundary (topology); Boundary value problem; Geometry; Boundary layer thickness; Mechanics; Algorithm; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000585969,0.0004275475,0.000644922,0.0003697128,0.0004025645,0.0004934476,0.001359449,0.001200738,0.004820231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001436963,0.0003767337,0.0004456092,0.0003785221,0.0004473022,0.0007657384,0.0008731842,0.0008989778,0.0009550183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004675869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001287622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002089431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002953329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997501,0.00006107992,0.00001691455,0.00003201798,0.0001203556,0.00001957941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996974,0.0001165076,0.00002188865,0.00003686094,0.0001042123,0.0000231342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003975927,0.0002802734,0.001287785,0.0004791879,0.00005689056,0.0002385922,0.0002953694,0.5427118,0.06238913,0.1569768,0.006350433,0.2285361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000241635,0.00002890862,0.000123141,0.00001216823,0.000005925419,0.0000412689,0.000009754041,0.9907349,0.002552238,0.003608063,0.002847271,0.00001219484],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008163762,0.00008385222,0.9883272,0.0000706545,0.00008968901,0.00005922922,0.00006484117,0.0001498457,0.002990979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08246395,0.00008502689,0.9136648,0.00007608305,0.00003021175,0.000186871,0.0001494399,0.0001217471,0.003221828],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004820231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01612526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03341095265633933,"score_gpt":0.2884768538702902,"score_spread":0.2550659012139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}