{"id":"W3022830994","doi":"10.1136/oem-2019-epi.43","title":"O2C.3 What predicts a secondary absence following return to work among workers’ compensation claimants in victoria? Results from a longitudinal cohort","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Workers' compensation; Cohort; Respondent; Medicine; Cohort study; Occupational safety and health; Occupational injury; Compensation (psychology); Work (physics); Sample (material); Demography; Psychology; Physical therapy; Family medicine; Injury prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214221,0.0003081488,0.0003959583,0.0006953395,0.001122642,0.001292379,0.001437219,0.001045876,0.004994567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008194837,0.0003788607,0.002393073,0.0009018208,0.0004612775,0.0006773504,0.001490132,0.001004931,0.0007907999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001251687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002644938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2135002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.195636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984866,0.0003545858,0.0001335764,0.0003109328,0.0002983185,0.0004159509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996197,0.0005717691,0.001458217,0.0002933866,0.0006471626,0.0008324016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001145874,0.00003162385,0.9982067,0.00002486444,0.00007345581,0.00002430546,0.0001561487,0.00002870602,0.00005803461,0.00002041318,0.0003641476,0.0008969622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008885926,0.00007290632,0.9989084,0.00005017947,0.00005435488,0.0000314762,0.0003068675,0.0002150718,0.00001613708,0.00002788113,0.000303297,0.000004474298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950871,0.000571629,0.0001783969,0.0004549648,0.0000359356,0.00004726732,0.002555985,0.000005034059,0.001063713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966044,0.0001384252,0.000179326,0.0001191481,0.00001946434,0.00006075671,0.001767364,0.000006232794,0.001104806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2135002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.424515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03792004624439407,"score_gpt":0.3579200598159555,"score_spread":0.3200000135715615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}