{"id":"W3023237703","doi":"10.1101/2020.04.27.063990","title":"A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Universität Innsbruck; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Environmental DNA; In silico; Scale (ratio); Computational biology; Sampling (signal processing); Data mining; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Cartography; Geography; Genetics; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004306509,0.0005032859,0.0005144036,0.0000671677,0.0003299793,0.00007682038,0.0009190327,0.0002189828,0.0001653303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001336105,0.0004652281,0.0001991017,0.0002526258,0.000416389,0.0001588672,0.002427397,0.0003123982,0.0002038747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007183228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001313585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005131875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001585114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973595,0.0000866237,0.0004992157,0.000958452,0.0006356832,0.0004605629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983534,0.0001236004,0.0004057657,0.00088965,0.00001701,0.0002105647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346409,0.00008700886,0.2937518,0.0000678879,0.00005677393,0.000003390903,0.00007454742,0.000219651,0.7053803,0.000004399077,0.0003127498,0.000006824142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007394,0.0000638549,0.5166953,0.00005966192,0.00009631075,7.423425e-9,0.00002725152,0.00005079059,0.481123,0.000001172937,0.001372197,0.0003097835],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950365,0.00008401956,0.0009742058,0.0006614776,0.0006219524,0.00147894,0.00102493,0.00009354311,0.00002438679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841481,0.0001173261,0.01500669,0.000108772,0.0003035755,0.0002243104,0.000001138005,0.00006593565,0.00002419618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2242573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02472037448231488,"score_gpt":0.2105037758940211,"score_spread":0.1857834014117063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}