{"id":"W3023419169","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101626","title":"Agriculture insurance for disaster risk reduction: A case study of Malaysia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Disaster risk reduction; Risk management; Agriculture; Risk pool; Business interruption insurance; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); General partnership; Environmental planning; Finance; Insurance policy; Key person insurance; General insurance; Income protection insurance; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005737295,0.0003572673,0.0001918887,0.0007466488,0.001595349,0.001172914,0.0006562899,0.001698507,0.002902179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001181445,0.0001939267,0.0003681273,0.0007573037,0.0007727697,0.0008407592,0.0009131452,0.0006979583,0.0002534684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001504436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001128367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01831849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03196354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997002,0.0001016811,0.00001532996,0.00002478101,0.00004411045,0.0001139594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990699,0.0004087203,0.0001863154,0.0000459869,0.00007764233,0.0002114994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001310301,0.004772243,0.5596158,0.0006874079,0.0003080136,0.1694159,0.03997187,0.06372264,0.009317909,0.0271918,0.006981507,0.1167046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002123632,0.003752786,0.438368,0.0006781095,0.0003299664,0.06355447,0.2877465,0.1378899,0.0119942,0.009474903,0.04572236,0.0002764611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960461,0.0001008103,0.0004467401,0.0002820001,0.000004052657,0.00002435934,0.00005332314,0.00000802749,0.00303464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972661,0.0001912173,0.0005957455,0.00002052107,0.00000345738,0.000005086378,0.00002479259,0.000002283622,0.001890783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01831849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03642374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02610265563269499,"score_gpt":0.2467536649513087,"score_spread":0.2206510093186137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}