{"id":"W3023552461","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004","title":"GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Medicine; MEDLINE; Quality of evidence; Randomized controlled trial; Surgery; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8737776950481684,"score_gpt":0.6260377094438844,"score_spread":0.247739985604284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}