{"id":"W3023581952","doi":"10.1111/ter.12466","title":"Magnetic characterization of the zigzag shaped J‐anomaly: Implications for kinematics and breakup processes at the Iberia–Newfoundland margins","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Terra Nova","topic":"Geological and Geochemical Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Breakup; Geology; Magnetic anomaly; Lithosphere; Anomaly (physics); Plate tectonics; Zigzag; Crust; Seismology; Geophysics; Paleontology; Tectonics; Geometry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005355917,0.00007833464,0.000125543,0.000009392031,0.0001309965,0.0000253655,0.0001803261,0.00003099374,0.003501671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001111226,0.0000372235,0.0000424748,0.0002706205,0.0001181979,0.00004079842,0.00003430294,0.00003959082,0.00001669916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001273528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001502075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002309672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002155935,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994764,0.00001813622,0.0001694232,0.000146633,0.00007428314,0.0001150798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995549,0.0001283408,0.00009318133,0.0001189485,0.00005589258,0.00004868019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005487278,0.00002627149,0.938943,0.000236942,0.00003315449,1.676874e-7,0.0004885531,0.0000563131,0.05094388,0.00008862984,0.0001785134,0.008949718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001234767,0.00006346343,0.9934195,0.000005974903,0.00005744691,0.000003566449,0.00001777179,0.003465261,0.0003132783,0.001163565,0.001304384,0.00006234102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774294,0.0001187874,0.0002034134,0.02086282,0.00002335016,0.0002435076,0.000224811,0.00001186193,0.0008820888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998339,0.00002681128,0.0001516753,0.001047989,0.00005279939,0.000004506949,0.0001874213,0.000001594701,0.0001882343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05447649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03082921104950194,"score_gpt":0.2150692712929712,"score_spread":0.1842400602434692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}