{"id":"W3024273162","doi":"10.3386/w22369","title":"Bunching at the Kink: Implications for Spending Responses to Health Insurance Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Actuarial science; Object (grammar); Public economics; Economic model; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007543791,0.0004604992,0.001533296,0.0006954982,0.0009586302,0.002731571,0.001451675,0.001789542,0.01096785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04950891,0.0006252049,0.001144601,0.0009977857,0.003073322,0.004007803,0.002187376,0.003047373,0.0003406202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001986227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009591458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005591508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004316657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970612,0.00170976,0.000113139,0.0004728564,0.0002635885,0.0003793785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977777,0.01559698,0.002890598,0.002419509,0.0005130235,0.0008030093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004960822,0.0002975015,0.02178161,0.0001919343,0.0001542028,0.0008383704,0.001331632,0.1602299,0.001518355,0.7886724,0.004088464,0.02039958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007456973,0.00007458929,0.01012194,0.00004663407,0.00002957871,0.0001091173,0.0006903437,0.3018305,0.0003040055,0.6851021,0.001561692,0.00005501563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8309268,0.0007049445,0.1371697,0.007729475,0.0001403569,0.0001282491,0.0006450127,0.0003042663,0.02225117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918336,0.0001503375,0.004180823,0.0004457455,0.00003350965,0.00005398041,0.00008617197,0.00004914503,0.003166716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01096785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03989583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.559283377291739,"score_gpt":0.553850490943654,"score_spread":0.005432886348085031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}