{"id":"W30243353","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.017","title":"Celebrity and credibility in environmental communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Credibility; Persuasion; Rhetoric; Ethos; Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Population; Power (physics); Political science; Source credibility; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118899,0.00003806917,0.00005689747,0.00001513474,0.0001349137,0.00001297042,0.00008856679,0.00001028674,0.00159815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000383885,0.00003190768,0.000009831251,0.000005876043,0.0002343244,0.0001021692,0.000109897,0.00005369415,0.00002654942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001260145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001802695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001027436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001678562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997133,0.00004072426,0.00009822753,0.00006227492,0.00003485481,0.00005059743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999697,0.00002645866,0.00002032063,0.0002382163,0.000005057723,0.0000129703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670173,0.0003052959,0.1386388,0.000005914955,0.00001362202,2.619859e-7,0.1997565,2.964124e-8,0.00001119983,0.65051,0.001368785,0.009372868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004475654,0.00005271094,0.7171863,0.000009068553,0.000009113918,0.000001025955,0.07503694,0.0001010509,0.0000822092,0.03042264,0.1764463,0.0002051618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5672342,0.0006490708,0.000005426763,0.0001091235,0.00001713377,0.00004792254,0.000002040925,0.00001818121,0.4319169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699,0.0005449551,0.0002048267,0.00008060622,0.000008784377,0.00001036605,0.00000269988,0.000002030921,0.002155736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09437590584171776,"score_gpt":0.213225449260569,"score_spread":0.1188495434188513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}