{"id":"W3024801252","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2020.101532","title":"Scale, history and justice in community wind energy: An empirical review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Research & Social Science","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Wright; Empirical research; Ambiguity; Context (archaeology); CLARITY; Sociology; Economic Justice; Wind power; Scale (ratio); Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009340848,0.0001928893,0.0004199588,0.0002272406,0.004158595,0.0001922387,0.002020237,0.0002105826,0.0002989358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003393999,0.000185994,0.00007180504,0.004288102,0.006760909,0.00127778,0.000644048,0.0009044585,0.000007847244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001681632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002889661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07285205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06894248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912277,0.003778875,0.0003551162,0.0006689618,0.002650351,0.001318939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974234,0.00053125,0.0001071667,0.0003019691,0.0005877828,0.00104846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001297218,0.0007432959,0.007576632,0.0003792518,0.00001923571,0.00008006006,0.1288063,0.00003438968,0.002716993,0.2032515,0.07973509,0.5765275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003957055,0.000229736,0.008359148,0.0001973361,0.0000210003,0.000001117091,0.04009318,0.0002268368,0.0001549968,0.005880655,0.9439089,0.0005313531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3978714,0.02769567,0.0001702099,0.06930171,0.001329621,0.0005825247,0.00001127615,0.0004770467,0.5025606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763036,0.01314692,0.000201083,0.007710848,0.001413286,0.00004363057,0.000005082896,0.00002623801,0.001149363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8641738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1896253900748059,"score_gpt":0.4590408889490691,"score_spread":0.2694154988742633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}