{"id":"W3025591180","doi":"10.1017/s1748499521000178","title":"Impact of the choice of risk assessment time horizons on defined benefit pension schemes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Actuarial Science","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Bond; Asset allocation; Pension; Economics; Time horizon; Equity (law); Incentive; Risk premium; Horizon; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Financial economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Portfolio; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002683033,0.0001449513,0.0003298647,0.0001629141,0.0005800746,0.00006627298,0.0009755356,0.00007329213,0.0002177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002311028,0.0001035383,0.0003853997,0.002096167,0.001569325,0.0003770316,0.0002755521,0.0001562989,0.000006214064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005949684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009200969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00949441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001191952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967882,0.0002468531,0.0004335542,0.0003749372,0.001717373,0.0004391028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971422,0.0004384847,0.000634103,0.000651804,0.001014579,0.0001188329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002033047,0.001970653,0.6902187,0.00005672053,0.0003417487,0.000004841245,0.005573162,0.001692674,0.07484245,0.1857759,0.003414087,0.03590576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236419,0.0002377146,0.9754034,0.00007095149,0.00003825972,1.313171e-7,0.0002440305,0.00008072321,0.01814654,0.004530827,0.0008840673,0.0001269075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792596,0.00005075898,0.00001909738,0.0008596135,0.0004529991,0.0002678305,0.00006383463,0.00001507953,0.01901116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990544,0.0002847454,0.0004047374,0.00006310795,0.0001008762,0.000003367474,0.000002068171,0.000006250989,0.00008040202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2851847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04832944782587889,"score_gpt":0.3971130355113609,"score_spread":0.348783587685482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}