{"id":"W3025817863","doi":"","title":"Assessment of food-water nexus by water footprint: a case study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AGUFM","topic":"Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Water use; Footprint; Environmental science; Water resource management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008500905,0.000514855,0.0004620207,0.00160966,0.002689213,0.00216084,0.001341086,0.0008121561,0.001824331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001627984,0.000316369,0.0006724329,0.005705918,0.001130031,0.0007577737,0.001432752,0.000767118,0.0001162534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05147189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04600228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993564,0.0001286953,0.00002154152,0.00006092256,0.0001750653,0.0002573693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987312,0.0002820369,0.00008415855,0.00004788519,0.0006477924,0.0002069054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007163379,0.000683595,0.8725909,0.0003425269,0.0007326993,0.006225052,0.004065406,0.04456455,0.002969416,0.01042265,0.01169152,0.0449953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001403245,0.000187162,0.8587351,0.0002367042,0.0003195666,0.0003347376,0.05611256,0.06309307,0.001955346,0.002653148,0.01611114,0.0001211216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873261,0.0002985173,0.0004620855,0.0006753975,0.000008083383,0.0001223274,0.002037095,0.00001786697,0.009052409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936298,0.0003882996,0.001348358,0.0001545668,0.000002328016,0.00004231177,0.0006968086,0.00001068593,0.003726847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05147189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3734564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009712470959443264,"score_gpt":0.2170237088874147,"score_spread":0.2073112379279715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}