{"id":"W3027262520","doi":"10.1115/1.4047270","title":"Impact Analysis of Inline Inspection Accuracy on Pipeline Integrity Planning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Integrity management; Reliability engineering; Pipeline (software); Structural integrity; Risk assessment; Schedule; Pipeline transport; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Plan (archaeology); Data integrity; Risk management; Engineering; Computer security; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002607512,0.0006607717,0.0004543292,0.0009608952,0.0002079338,0.0007222339,0.0007162812,0.0006874743,0.0008792823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01182039,0.0002489259,0.0003916652,0.0007547864,0.0004481842,0.0007865757,0.0004806469,0.0006537243,0.00009115706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001178953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004584743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005259959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002903627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972237,0.001101013,0.00009290272,0.000295088,0.0009876996,0.0002996398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754351,0.01737527,0.003188295,0.001589547,0.002240339,0.0001713826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004132043,0.00008826436,0.01481707,0.0001290293,0.00006294965,0.0001501383,0.00004267746,0.9417332,0.01891947,0.0009043569,0.0001945661,0.02254513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001135856,0.0004252499,0.01633494,0.00001969646,0.0000732542,0.0001054007,0.00005478915,0.9452195,0.03682634,0.0006097945,0.0002948804,0.00002496971],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744435,0.0006422674,0.1214431,0.0001837531,0.00002797254,0.00003875647,0.0002465525,0.0003353327,0.002638754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994342,0.00004437621,0.005427602,0.000007833249,0.000002433738,0.000004571316,0.00003209681,0.00001436926,0.0001247032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005259959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01379001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02218160164079221,"score_gpt":0.3019637298851641,"score_spread":0.2797821282443719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}