{"id":"W3027445498","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1157","title":"PNS159 THE UTILITY OF UMBRELLA REVIEWS: A CASE-STUDY ON THE SAFETY OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Value in Health","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"EVERSANA (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Observational study; Sample size determination; Systematic review; Population; Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Meta-analysis; Medicine; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Medical physics; MEDLINE; Statistics; Pathology; Mathematics; Environmental health; Geography; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1000772,0.001274895,0.00277783,0.006510108,0.001340057,0.005003531,0.0012831,0.004457606,0.005190902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3934837,0.001010488,0.007689292,0.006589557,0.001535138,0.003750432,0.00313281,0.002465075,0.0005143856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003673912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004772429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00499873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007051258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7762814,0.1845075,0.02320514,0.003988696,0.01101583,0.001001532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5000933,0.4405624,0.02875619,0.01344534,0.01607465,0.001068043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02297291,0.0003979132,0.07871621,0.1355078,0.1055826,0.006183266,0.004877908,0.003315478,0.002328909,0.02285995,0.02690227,0.5903548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01017096,0.004922471,0.08699928,0.2996572,0.2714703,0.0157285,0.004932506,0.0156159,0.006721708,0.05471345,0.2283452,0.0007227125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.13897,0.7361338,0.02859805,0.04497342,0.002413795,0.002435968,0.004925543,0.0002030587,0.0413464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8300446,0.1212777,0.03234496,0.009600777,0.001498833,0.001386265,0.001458349,0.0001898478,0.002198715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8534689212612868,"score_gpt":0.5460346040034282,"score_spread":0.3074343172578586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}