{"id":"W3028609296","doi":"10.1186/s12874-020-00962-8","title":"Translation method is validity evidence for construct equivalence: analysis of secondary data routinely collected during translations of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Cancer survivorship and care","field":"Medicine","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council; Deakin University","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Construct (python library); Natural language processing; Prom; Construct validity; Health literacy; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3636621,0.001111827,0.002328965,0.006693719,0.003837076,0.007561441,0.002028325,0.002023543,0.005081505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6415874,0.001371486,0.002499015,0.01067493,0.01500684,0.007293702,0.007489433,0.003522672,0.002023158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003804324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01704159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001688893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001619789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4090275,0.4702822,0.0387757,0.01673426,0.0631242,0.00205614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2431089,0.5072871,0.07036159,0.09550057,0.0823287,0.001413129],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001375537,0.0007696878,0.1815943,0.02519419,0.002823504,0.0009522425,0.239238,0.001474612,0.004711071,0.1025707,0.01992562,0.4193706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001867688,0.005321223,0.2530489,0.068689,0.003979005,0.00356297,0.131136,0.01442892,0.02059347,0.2493405,0.2471146,0.0009177578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2741295,0.006776812,0.6061837,0.02080347,0.002360567,0.02177621,0.003007301,0.0005838343,0.0643785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985058,0.00237738,0.2511729,0.00530885,0.0004752919,0.03813852,0.001732488,0.0005222207,0.001766571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3636621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7847179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8037549855598017,"score_gpt":0.630616517361185,"score_spread":0.1731384681986168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}